Rigidity of the affected femurs with systems of surgical treatment

Authors

  • N. Shidlovskiy Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • M. Dyman Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • A. Ilnitsky SI " Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics NAMS Ukraine ", Ukraine
  • V. Shytikov Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20535/2521-1943.2017.79.97520

Keywords:

osteosynthesis, metastatic bone tumor, reinforced osteosynthesis, transosseus extrafocal osteosynthesis, fragments fixation stiffness, power fixation of fractures, fracture fixation stability, extramedullar plate, bone cement, thigh-bone

Abstract

Purpose. Subject matter of the present paper is to investigate the characteristics of rigidity and reliability of fixing of pathological changes at metastatic defeat are investigated in real, including cyclic, the modes of influence of external loadings. Design/methodology/approach. During experiment was used of extremities without pathology of a bone tissue and with a tumor on a bone tissue . Fixing of bone fragments (osteosynthesis) has been executed by means of the device of external fixing of A. Kostiuk and by means of reinforcing of a metal osteosynthesis by system with application of a extramedullar plate and bone cement. Tests were carried out, transferring freight on the fixed femur fragment change diversely. Ways of loadings: compression, a bend and rotation and cyclically variable freights which model human weight. Results. The reinforced metal osteosynthesis with application of a extramedullar plate and bone cement is more stable method of fixing in comparison with rod devices of external fixing like AVF-K. Fixing of a change in the way of a metal osteosynthesis significantly interferes with development of deformations at action of cyclic loadings. Is the most dangerous from the point of view of physiological reliability for both studied systems of an osteosynthesis bending and rotational loadings. Originality/cost. Results are important for medicine and can improve treatment.

References

  1. Bur’yanov, O.A. (2011), “Nash dosvid likuvannya hvorih z metastatichnim urazhennyam kistok”, Travma, 12 (2) pp. 112–4.
  2. Sim, F.H. (1992), “Metastatic bone disease of the pelvic and femur”, Instr Course Lect, 41, pp. 317–27.
  3. Futani, H., Kamae, S. and Atsui, K. (2002), “Successful limb salvage of pathological fracture of the distal tibia caused by cancer metastasis”, Orthop Sci, 7 (2), pp. 262–6.
  4. Teplyakov, V.V., Karpenko, V.Yu. and Valieva, A.K. (2005), “Hirurgicheskoe lechenie patologicheskih perelomov dlinnyih trubchatyih kostey pri metastaticheskom porazhenii”, Vopr.onkol, 51 (3), pp. 377–81.
  5. Tihilov, R.M., Grigorev, P.V. and Zasulskiy, F.Yu. (2009), “Hirurgicheskoe lechenie bolnyih s metastaticheskimi porazheniyami dlinnyih kostey”, Materialyi Vserossiyskoy konferentsii s mezhdunarodnyim uchastiem “Endoprotezirovanie krupnyih sustavov”, Moskow, 21–22 aprelya.
  6. Bickels, J., Dadia, S. and Lidar, Z. (2009), “Surgical management of metastatic bone disease”, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 91 (6), pp. 1503–16.
  7. Spencer, S.J. (2001), “Locked intramedullary nailing of symptomatic metastases in the humerus”, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 92-B (1), pp. 142–5.
  8. Wedin, R. (2005), “Surgical treatment of skeletal metastatic lesions of the proximal femur: endoprosthesis or reconstruction nail”, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 87-B, pp. 1653–7.
  9. Fleisch, H. (2000), Bisphosphonates in bone disease, From the laboratory to the patient, Fourth Ed. Academic Press, San Diego-London, pp. 68–87.
  10. Karachalios, T., Atkins, R.M. and Sarangi, P.P. (1993), “Reconstruction nailing for pathologi-cal subtrochanteric fractures with coexisting femoral shaft metastases”, J Bone Joint Surg Br; 75-B, pp. 119–22.
  11. Kostyuk, A.N. (2015), Posibnik z metodiki osteosintezu aparatami zovnishnoyi fiksatsiyi AZF-K, TOV “Lazurit-poligraf”, Kyiv, Ukraine.
  12. Shidlovskiy, N.S. (2011), Metodyi issledovaniya deformatsionnoy nadezhnosti sistem osteosinteza konechnostey cheloveka, Biomedichna Inzheneriya, Kyiv, no 1, pp. 24-31.
  13. Shidlovskiy, N.S., Laksha, A.M. and Shpak, D.E. (2011), Naturnyie ispyitaniya sistem “bolshebertsovaya kost s perelomom – sterzhnevoy apparat fiksatsii”, Visnik Natsionalnogo tehnichnogo universitetu Ukrayini "Kiyivskiy politehnichniy institut", Seriya Mashinobuduvannya, Kyiv, no 61 vol. 2, pp. 134 –140.
  14. Shidlovskiy, N.S., Laksha, A.M. and Dyman, M.M. (2014), Osobennosti vyibora rezhimov biomehanicheskih naturnyih ispyitaniy sistem osteosinteza s uchetom tsiklicheskih nagruzok, Litopis travmatologiyi ta ortopediyi, no 1-2, (29-30), pp. 115-120.

Downloads

Published

2017-06-22

How to Cite

[1]
N. Shidlovskiy, M. Dyman, A. Ilnitsky, and V. Shytikov, “Rigidity of the affected femurs with systems of surgical treatment”, Mech. Adv. Technol., no. 1(79), pp. 57–63, Jun. 2017.

Issue

Section

Original study