# Method of matched sections in application to thin-walled and Mindlin rectangular plates

## Authors

• Kirill Danylenko Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute, Ukraine
• Igor Orynyak Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute, Ukraine

## Keywords:

Method of matched sections, transfer matrix method, rectangular plate, Mindlin plate, boundary conditions, conjugation

## Abstract

The paper elaborates the principally new variant of finite element method in application to plate problem. It differs from classical FEM approach by, at least, three points. First, it uses the strong differential formulation rather than the weak one and suppose the approximate analytical solution of all differential equations. Second, it explicitly uses all geometrical and physical parameters in the procedure of solution, rather than some chosen ones, for example, displacement and angles of rotation as usually done in FEM formulation. Third, the conjugation between adjacent elements occurs between the adjacent sections rather than in polygon vertexes. These conditions require the continuity of displacements, angles, moments and forces. Each side of rectangular elements is characterized by 6 main parameters, so, at whole there are 24 parameters for each rectangular element. The right and upper sides’ parameters are considered as output ones, and they are related with lower and left sides ones by matrix equations, which allows to apply transfer matrix method for the compilation of the resulting system of equations for the whole plate. The numerical examples for the thin-walled and Mindlin plates show the high efficiency and accuracy of the method.

## References

1. V.V. Meleshko, “Bending of an elastic rectangular clamped plate: exact versus ‘engineering’ solutions”, Journal of elasticity, 48, pp. 1–50, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007472709175
2. M. Gander, F. Kwok, “Chladni figures and the Tacoma bridge: motivating PDE eigenvalue probems via vibrating plates”, SIAM Rev., 54(3): pp. 573–596, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1137/10081931X
3. S.P. Timoshenko and S. Woinowsky-Krieger, Theory of plates and shells, 2nd ed., New York: McGraw-Hill, 1959. 595 p.
4. C.E. Imrak and I. Gerdemeli, “An exact solution for the deflection of a clamped rectangular plate under uniform load”, Applied mathematical sciences, 1(43), pp. 2129–2137, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10778-007-0069-8
5. X. Liu and J.R. Banerjee, “Free vibration analysis for plates with arbitrary boundary conditions using a novel spectral-dynamic stiffness method”, Computers & Structures, 164, pp. 108–126, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2015.11.005
6. P. Moreno-García et al., “A review and study on Ritz method admissible functions with emphasis on buckling and free vibration of isotropic and anisotropic beams and plates,” Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, Vol. 25, pp. 785–815, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-017-9214-7
7. C.A.J. Fletcher, Computational Galerkin methods, New-York: Springer-Verlag, 1984. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85949-6
8. B.A. Finlayson and L.E. Scriven, “The Method of Weighted Residual: A Review,” ASME Appl. Mech. Rev., 19, pp. 735–748, 1966.
9. Q. Wang, D. Shi, Q. Liang, & F. Ahad, “An improved Fourier series solution for the dynamic analysis of laminated composite annular, circular, and sector plate with general boundary conditions,” Journal of Composite Materials, 50(30), 4199–4233, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998316635240
10. M. El-Gamel, A. Mohsen and A. Abdrabou, “Sinc-Galerkin solution to the clamped plate eigenvalue problem,” SeMA Journal, Vol. 74. pp. 165–180, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40324-016-0086-9
11. Y. Bai and I. Orynyak, “Application of exponential functions in weighted residuals method in structural mechanics. Part II: static and vibration analysis of rectangular plate”, Mech. Adv. Technol., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 7–21, Jun. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20535/2521-1943.2021.5.1.234580
12. E. Ventsel, T. Krauthammer, Thin Plates and Shells: Theory, Analysis, and Applications, Marcel Deker, New York. 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203908723
13. T.J.R. Hughes, The Finite Element Method, Prentice-Hill, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey,1987.
14. D. Chapelle, K. Bathe, The Finite Element Analysis of Shells - Fundamentals, Springer, 2nd edition, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16408-8
15. R.W. McCune, C.G. Armstrong and D.J. Robinson, “Mixed‐dimensional coupling in finite element models”, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 49(6), pp. 725–750, 2000. DOI: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/1097-0207(20001030)49:6%3C725::AID-NME967%3E3.0.CO;2-W
16. S. Klarmann, J. Wackerfuß and S. Klinkel, “Coupling 2D continuum and beam elements: a mixed formulation for avoiding spu-rious stresses”, Computational Mechanics, 70(6), pp. 1145–1166, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-022-02221-7
17. F. Leckie, E. Pestel, “Transfer-matrix fundamentals”, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, Vol. 2, Issue 3, pp. 137–167, 1960. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7403(60)90001-1
18. I. Orynyak, Calculation of complex systems by transfer matrix method, Kyiv. “I. Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnical Institute”, 324 p. ISBN978-617-7619-47-4. (in Ukrainian)2022)
19. K.H. Lee, G.T. Lim and C.M. Wang, “Thick Lévy plates re-visited”, International Journal of Solids and Structures, 39(1), pp. 127–144, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7683(01)00205-0

2023-09-19

## How to Cite

[1]
K. Danylenko and I. Orynyak, “Method of matched sections in application to thin-walled and Mindlin rectangular plates”, Mech. Adv. Technol., vol. 7, no. 2 (98), pp. 205–215, Sep. 2023.

Mechanics