Determination of the KIC Fracture Toughness of the X210Cr12 High-Strength Material

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20535/2521-1943.2023.7.2.282705

Keywords:

fracture mechanics, fracture toughness, crack opening displacement, high strength steels, X210Cr12

Abstract

Purpose: It is an important problem that the machines become unusable due to the deformation of the machine elements produced before the planned time. In this study, it was aimed to determine the KIC value of X210Cr12, which is a high strength material. In this way, more accurate load values can be used in the design.
Methods: In the experimental study to determine the KIC value, the sample geometry, the crack depth, the load-dependent parameters and calculations and some conformity checks were carried out. Experimental system; KIC consists of 3-point flexure specimens, a press, an electronic circuit capable of detecting the change in load crack opening, and a logger.
Findings: In the study, the loads were determined from experimental graphs. Subsequently, load-crack opening values were determined. With these data, the KIC values were calculated as 719,7 and 839,7 MPa.mm1/2 as the minumum and maximum values, respectively.
Conclusion: The experimental graphs are in the form of curves that break abruptly with unstable crack propagation without showing plastic deformation. There is no study in the literature on the KIC value of X210Cr12 and it has been determined that it has a low KIC value compared to the high-strength steels studied. It is valuable to determine the KIC value, as fracture problems may occur in designs prepared with the material. The results of the study are data at room temperature.

References

  1. T. Aikawa and T. Kawabata, “Consideration on the toughness difference depending on the direction of brittle crack prooagation in very thick steel,” Procedia Structural Integrity, Vol. 21, pp. 173–184, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2019.12.099
  2. ASTM-E399-12:2013. American Standart Institution. Standart Test Methods for Plane-Strain Fracture Thoughness of Metaşllic Materials. October.
  3. E. Ateş, Analysis of 3 Different Materials with Fracture Toughness Measurement Methods. Master Thesis. Uludag University. Graduate School of Natural and Applied Science. Bursa, Turkey. August, 1987.
  4. BS 5762:1979. British Standarts Institution. Methods for Crack Opening Displacement (COD) Testing.
  5. C. Fan et al., “Loading rate effect and failure mechanisms of ultra-high-strength steel under mode II fracture,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, Vol. 171, 104374, pp. 1–13, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2022.104374
  6. H. Gao et al., “A modified normalization method for determining fracture toughness of steel,” Fatigue & Fracture of Engineer-ing Materials & Structures, Vol. 44, pp. 568–583, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.13380
  7. J.F. Kalthof and A. Bürgel, Influence of loading rate on shear fracture toughness for failure mode transition. Oral/Poster Refer-ence: ICF10 1096 OR, Experimental Mechanics, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany, 2004.
  8. P. Koester, C. Benz and M. Sander, “Investigation of mixed mode fatigue crack propagation in SEN-specimen under in-phase and out-of-phase conditions due to tension-compression and torsional loading,” in Proc. (ICMFF12) MATEC Web of Confer-ences 300, 11006, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201930011006
  9. D.M. Kulkarni, R. Prakash and A.N. Kumar, “Experimental and finite element analysis of fracture criterion in general yielding fracture mechanics,” Sadhana, Vol. 27, Part 6, pp. 631–642, Dec., 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02703355
  10. W. Ma and Z. Duan, “Investigation of mode II crack growth following a very high speed ımpact,” Journal of Mechanics of Ma-terials and Structures, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 271–290, Feb., 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2140/jomms.2008.3.271
  11. A. Neimitz and J. Galkiewicz, “The experimental-numerical analyses of the failure mechanisms of S355JR steel,” Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 108, 102666, pp. 1–14, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102666
  12. E. Orowan, “Fracture strength of solids,” In Report on Progress in Physics, Physical Society of London: London, Vol. 12, pp. 185–232, 1949. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/12/1/309
  13. G.C. Sih, Handbook of stress intensity factors, Institute of fracture and solid mechanics: Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, 1976.
  14. A. Shukla, Practical Fracture Mechanics in Design. Second Edition, Revised and Expanded. Marcel Dekker, NY, 2005.
  15. V.T. Troshchenko, V.V. Pokrovskii, “Fatigue Fracture Toughness of Metals and Alloys. Part 1. Experimental Procedures and Materials and General Principles,” Strength of Materials, 35, pp. 1–13, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022909018616
  16. A.A. Wells, 1973. The condition of fast fracture in aluminum alloys with particular reference to comet failures. British Welding Research Association Report, April 1955.
  17. C. Yan and Y.W. Mai, “Effect of crack depth and specimen width on fracture toughness of a carbon steel in the ductile-brittle transition region,” International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, Vol. 77, pp. 313–319, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-0161(00)00017-X
  18. A. Zeinedini, “A novel fixture for mixed mode I/II/III fracture testing of brittle materials,” Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, Vol. 42, pp. 838–853, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.12955

Downloads

Published

2023-10-16

How to Cite

ATEŞ, E. (2023). Determination of the KIC Fracture Toughness of the X210Cr12 High-Strength Material. Mechanics and Advanced Technologies, 7(2), 193–199. https://doi.org/10.20535/2521-1943.2023.7.2.282705

Issue

Section

Mechanics