Detailing the idea of the design process of hydraulic automation objects

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20535/2521-1943.2023.7.2.287524

Keywords:

design process, simulation, design time reducing, hydro automatics

Abstract

The work is touched to the design methods of the complex technical objects. The reason of the objects complication is the requirement of the dynamical processes coordination because the planed characteristics are needed. The main design stages idea – circuit diagram – simulation – structure are considered. The means of the design stages information representing of traditional approach are the relatively commonly and not consistent. It leads to design time increasing. In this work to structure the design information, coordinate the means of the different stage information representation with each others and detail design process are proposed. To do it the common information space of knowledge of the subject aria are separated on the streams. The streams represent information about the content, uniting, activities and requirements. The design process is represented as the transactions chain. Each transaction is based on the named streams and successively forms the state of the resulting functional stream. These states reflect the readiness levels of the designed object. Due to this way of means representation and detailing of information the coordination between different stages was provided.  There are the possibilities to check the stage correctness executing also. As result the iteration reducing and time consumption of the design process are reached. The design process is illustrated by the example.

Author Biography

Oleksandr Uzunov, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”

Educational and Research Institute of Mechanical Engineering

Department of Fluid Mechanics and Mechatronics

References

  1. G. Booch, Object oriented design with application, The Benjamin, Cummings Publisher Company Inc, 1991.
  2. VDI 2206: Design methodology for mechatronical systems, Beuth, Berlin, 2004.
  3. A. Ertas and J.C. Jones, The engineering design process, John Wiley& Sons, Inc, 1993, 515p.
  4. R. Dudziak, C. Kohn and R. Sell, Integrated systems and design, TUT Press, Tallinn, 2008, 208 p.
  5. E. Gorrostieta et al., Mechatronics methodology: 15 years of experience, Ing. Investig., vol. 35, no. 3, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.v35n3.47543
  6. J. Johnson and A. Henderson, Conceptual Models: Core to Good Design, Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2011, 110p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2200/S00391ED1V01Y201111HCI012
  7. F. Christophe, A. Bernard and É. Coatanéa, “RFBS: A model for knowledge representation of conceptual design”, CIRP annals, 59.1, pp. 155–158, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2010.03.105
  8. T. McCaffrey and L. Spector, “An approach to human–machine collaboration in innovation”, Artificial Intelligence for Engi- neering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, No. 32, pp. 1–15, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060416000524
  9. V.I. Skurihin et al., Information technologies in testing complex objects: methods and means. Kyiv: Naukova dumka 1990, 320p.
  10. S.B. Tor, G.A. Britton and W.Y. Zhang, “Functional modeling in conceptual die design”. Technical Report 2003-1, Singapore- MIT Alliance - Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 2003.
  11. S.C. Dewhurst and K. Stark, Programming in C++. AT&T Bell Laboratories. Published by Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 1989.
  12. J. Kleer, “How circuits work”, Artificial Intelligence, 24(3), pp. 205–280, 1984. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(84)90040-7
  13. J. Kleer and J.S. Brown, “A qualitative physics based on confluences”, Artificial intelligence, 24(3), pp. 7–83, 1984. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(84)90037-7
  14. J. S. Gero, Design prototypes: A knowledge representation schema for design, ... in Engineering V: Design, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 177–193, 1990.
  15. Y. Umeda et al., “Function, Behavior, and Structure,” in Proc. Application of Artificial Intelligence in Engineering. Proceed- ings of the fifth International Conference, Vol. 1, 1990.
  16. Ying-Chieh Liu and A. Chakrabarti, “Physical realizations: Transforming into physical embodiments of concepts in the design of mechanical movements”, Advances in Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 5, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/318173
  17. Y. Shimomura et al., “Representation of design object based on the functional evolution process model.” Journal of Mechanical Design, 120.2, pp. 221–229, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2826962
  18. Yu Xia, Dongye Sun, Datong Qin and Wenfeng Hou, Study on the design method of a new hydromechanical continuously variable transmission system, IEEE Access, Vol. XX, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3005915
  19. Farhan A. Salem, Ahmad A. Mahfouz, “Mechatronics Design And Implementation Education-Oriented Methodology; A Pro- posed Approach”, Journal of Multidisciplinary Engineering Science and Technology, Vol. 1 Issue 3, October, 2014.
  20. D.C. Karnopp, D.L. Margolis and R.C. Rosenberg, System dynamic: a unified approach. A WILEY-INTERSCIENCE PUB- LICATION John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1990, 514 p.

Published

2023-09-29

How to Cite

[1]
O. Uzunov, “Detailing the idea of the design process of hydraulic automation objects”, Mech. Adv. Technol., vol. 7, no. 2 (98), pp. 172–178, Sep. 2023.

Issue

Section

Mechanics