Application of the geometric component of a product digital twin when studying its actual geometric parameters

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20535/2521-1943.2023.7.2.288545

Keywords:

aircraft, wing, production, geometric parameters, geometric models, assembly aircraft fixture, digital twin

Abstract

The article analyzes the results of using the digital twin concept to study changes in the geometric parameters (GP) of an aircraft wing during its production. The concept of creating a product digital twin is put into practice by constructing geometric models of the wing console at each key stage of its manufacture. The main attention is focused on studying the change in the GP of the caisson part of the wing console at the following stages: assembling of consoles in an aircraft fixture, assembling of consoles out of an aircraft fixture and final assembling of an aircraft. It is concluded that the first significant changes in wing GP appear at the stage of removing the wing caisson from the aircraft fixture. It is shown that even with acceptable mold forming characteristics of the aircraft fixture, it does not ensure compliance of the actual wing GP with the design data within the permitted tolerances and cannot be a means of controlling GP. It is substantiated the necessity of implementing into a wing caisson manufacturing technological process a procedure for monitoring the geometric shape of the unit after its removal from an aircraft fixture. It is proposed for a comprehensive assessment of isolated units’ geometric parameters to use a digital model of the aircraft, which is formed at each stage of the product manufacturing based on executed models of the units’ actual surfaces.

References

  1. M. Grieves, “Digital Twin: Manufacturing Excellence through Virtual Factory Replication”, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275211047_Digital_Twin_Manufacturing_Excellence_through_Virtual_Factory_Replication
  2. R. Rosen et al., “About The Importance of Autonomy and Digital Twins for the Future of Manufacturing”, IFAC-PapersOnLine, No. 48-3, pp. 567–572, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.141
  3. Naoki Kikuchi, Tomohiro Fukuda and Nobuyoshi Yabuki, “Future landscape visualization using a city digital twin: integration of augmented reality and drones with implementation of 3D model-based occlusion handling”, Journal of Computational De-sign and Engineering, No. 9(2), pp. 837–856, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jcde/qwac032
  4. A.Y. Nezenko, Geometrical modeling in the product life cycle processes: Author's abstract [Heometrychne modeliuvannia v protsesakh zhyttievoho tsyklu vyrobu: avtoref. dys. kand. tekhn. nauk], Kyiv, 2019, 24 p.
  5. V.V. Vanin, A.I. Nezenko and S.O. Kozlov, “An approach to the formation of geometric models of a digital twin at the production stage”, Modern problems of modeling, No. 22, pp. 3–11, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33842/22195203/2021/22/3/11
  6. V.V. Vanin, A.I. Nezenko and S.O. Kozlov, “The Methodology of Modeling the Actual Surfaces of an Aircraft Wing in the Process of its Manufacturing And Operation”, Modern problems of modeling, No. 25, pp. 158–168, 2023.
  7. S.O. Kozlov, “Method for determining actual installation angles of aircraft wing sections at the production stages”, in Proc. Conference proceedings of IX All-Ukrainian Scientific and Practical Conference of Students, Postgraduates and Young Scien-tists, Kyiv, pp. 11–15, 2020.

Published

2023-10-16

How to Cite

[1]
S. Kozlov and V. Vanin, “Application of the geometric component of a product digital twin when studying its actual geometric parameters”, Mech. Adv. Technol., vol. 7, no. 2 (98), pp. 257–262, Oct. 2023.

Issue

Section

Aviation Systems and Technologies