Adaptation of corporate model of ukrainian aircraft product life cycle to the international methodology of systems engineering

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20535/2521-1943.2023.7.3.289919

Keywords:

System engineering, complex technical system, aircraft construction product, science-intensive product, life cycle of science-intensive product

Abstract

Problems. Under the present-day conditions, the preservation of competences of Ukrainian aircraft construction enterprises will be determined by the possibility of enterprises attracting to participation in international cooperation programs and projects. But this is possible only on the condition of prior harmonization of the product development methodology adopted in Ukrainian aircraft construction to that used in the international aircraft construction projects.

Purose. The main goal of this article is to determine the ability and ways of adapting the corporate model of life cycle of aircraft engineering projects by Ukrainian aircraft construction enterprises to modern global aircraft construction practices.

Implementation methodology. The research methodology predicted the identification of the main modern trends in the field of system engineering for the creation of a science-intensive product, as well as the analysis of concepts of presenting the life cycle of complex technical systems in international regulatory documents, industry regulations, guidelines and other information sources. Criteria for perspective of using the identified informational and normative sources as close analogues for the development of one's own corporate model of life cycle of an aircraft construction product were identified. On the basis of the criterion analysis of researched concepts of the life cycle of complex technical systems representing, the requirements were formed, which formed the basis of the concept of one's own corporate model of life cycle of the aircraft construction product.

 The results. The result of conducted research was the proposed concept of a corporate model of the life cycle of an aircraft construction product manufactured in Ukraine, which takes into account the international experience and best practices of leading aircraft construction companies, including focusing on the experience accumulated by domestic aircraft manufacturers.

Conclusions. According to the results of analysis of advanced world practices in the field of creating a science-intensive product, an own corporate model of the life cycle of an aircraft product manufactured in Ukraine was proposed. In the future, on the basis of this model, a system for creating an aircraft product can be built and developed, which will be harmonized with existing world practices and will allow the domestic aircraft construction enterprises to fight for participation in international programs and projects.

References

  1. Unified system for design documentation. Stages of designing, GOST 2.103-68.
  2. System of products development and launching into manufacture. Products of industrial and technical designation, GOST 15.001-88.
  3. System of product development and launching into manufacture. Basic terms and definitions, DSTU 3278-95.
  4. System of development and launching into manufacture of armament and military equipment. Life cycle stages of armament and military equipment, DSTU V-P 15.004:2019.
  5. ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288:2016, System engineering and software. System life cycle processes.
  6. ISO/IECTS 24748-1:2018, Systems and software engineering, Life cycle management, Part 1: Guidelines for life cycle manage-ment, ISO/IECTS 24748-1:2016, IDT.
  7. ААР-20:2015 NATO programme management framework, NATO Life Cycle Model, 78 p.
  8. AAP-48:2013 NATO system life cycle processes, Edition B Version 1, 68 p.
  9. ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288:2015 Systems and software engineering, System life cycle processes.
  10. ISO/IECTR 24774:2016 Systems and software engineering, Life cycle management, Guidelines for process description, ISO/IEC TR 24774:2010, IDT.
  11. ISO/IECTS 24748-1:2018. Systems and software engineering, Life cycle management, Part 1: Guidelines for life cycle manage-ment, ISO/IECTS 24748-1:2016, IDT.
  12. ISO/IECTR 24748-2:2015, Life cycle management, Part 2, Guide to the application of ISO/IEC 15288, System life cycle pro-cesses) (ISO/IEC TR 24748-2:2011, IDT.
  13. ISO/IEC/IEEE 16326:2015 Systems and software engineering, Life cycle processes, Project management, ISO/IEC/IEEE 16326:2009, IDT.
  14. ISO 21500:2021 Project, programme and portfolio management, Context and concepts.
  15. ISO 21502:2020 Project, programme and portfolio management, Guidance on project management.
  16. ISO 21503:2022 Project, programme and portfolio management, Guidance on programme management.
  17. ISO 21504:2015 Project, programme and portfolio management, Guidance on portfolio management.
  18. ISO 21505:2017 Project, programme and portfolio management, Guidance on governance.
  19. ECSS–E–10A, Space Engineering. System Engineering, 19 April 1996, 66 p.
  20. ECSS–M–30A, Space Project Management. Project Phasing and Planning, 19 April 1996, 40 p.
  21. ECSS–M–40A, Space Project Management. Configuration Management, 19 April 1996, 27 p.
  22. ECSS-M-40B, Space Project Management, Configuration Management, 20 May 2005, 90 p.
  23. A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide), Project Management Institute. Sixth edition, Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute, 2017, 976 p.
  24. A guide to the project management body of knowledge, PMBOK guide, 2018, 726 p. ISBN 978-5-9693-0402-4.
  25. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, PMBOK Guide, Seventh Edition. Project Management Institute, 2021, 250 p. ANSI/PMI 99-001- 2021.
  26. A. Gray, K. Richardson, K. Rooke and T. Thornburn, “Guide to Life Cycles and Life Cycle Models. Published and used by INCOSE UK Ltd,” INCOSE and the Association for Project Management with permission, Issue 1.1, 2016, 41 p. Available: https://www.apm.org.uk/media/13835/guide-to-lifecycle-models.pdf.
  27. NASA systems engineering handbook, NASA/SP-2016-6105 Rev2 supersedes SP-2007-6105 Rev 1 dated, December, 2007., 297 p. Available: https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/nasa_systems_engineering_handbook_0.pdf.
  28. AP2054 Main. Develop new A/C (DnA), Business Process Definition, Issue: A, May 2001, 4 p.
  29. AP2054 Module 1. Develop new A/C (DnA), Business Process Definition, Milestones Model. Issue: A, May 2001. 21 p.
  30. AP2054 Module 2. Develop new A/C (DnA), Business Process Definition, Digital Product. Issue: A, May 2001. 42 p.
  31. AM2054 Design Integration and Build (DIB), Milestones. Issue: B, Nov 1998. 55 p.
  32. Standard of “IAC” PC, Procedure for managing aviation programs of IAC PC, General principles, Version 4.0. 10/14/2008, 89 p.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-22

How to Cite

[1]
S. Kryvova, C. Zvorykin, and S. Trubachev, “Adaptation of corporate model of ukrainian aircraft product life cycle to the international methodology of systems engineering”, Mech. Adv. Technol., vol. 7, no. 3 (99), pp. 394–404, Dec. 2023.

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 3 (99) (2023)

Section

Aviation Systems and Technologies

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Світлана Кривова, Костянтин Зворикін, Сергій Трубачев

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The ownership of copyright remains with the Authors.
 
Authors may use their own material in other publications provided that the Journal is acknowledged as the original place of publication and National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute” as the Publisher.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under CC BY 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work