Adaptation of corporate model of ukrainian aircraft product life cycle to the international methodology of systems engineering

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20535/2521-1943.2023.7.3.289919

Keywords:

System engineering, complex technical system, aircraft construction product, science-intensive product, life cycle of science-intensive product

Abstract

Problems. Under the present-day conditions, the preservation of competences of Ukrainian aircraft construction enterprises will be determined by the possibility of enterprises attracting to participation in international cooperation programs and projects. But this is possible only on the condition of prior harmonization of the product development methodology adopted in Ukrainian aircraft construction to that used in the international aircraft construction projects.

Purose. The main goal of this article is to determine the ability and ways of adapting the corporate model of life cycle of aircraft engineering projects by Ukrainian aircraft construction enterprises to modern global aircraft construction practices.

Implementation methodology. The research methodology predicted the identification of the main modern trends in the field of system engineering for the creation of a science-intensive product, as well as the analysis of concepts of presenting the life cycle of complex technical systems in international regulatory documents, industry regulations, guidelines and other information sources. Criteria for perspective of using the identified informational and normative sources as close analogues for the development of one's own corporate model of life cycle of an aircraft construction product were identified. On the basis of the criterion analysis of researched concepts of the life cycle of complex technical systems representing, the requirements were formed, which formed the basis of the concept of one's own corporate model of life cycle of the aircraft construction product.

 The results. The result of conducted research was the proposed concept of a corporate model of the life cycle of an aircraft construction product manufactured in Ukraine, which takes into account the international experience and best practices of leading aircraft construction companies, including focusing on the experience accumulated by domestic aircraft manufacturers.

Conclusions. According to the results of analysis of advanced world practices in the field of creating a science-intensive product, an own corporate model of the life cycle of an aircraft product manufactured in Ukraine was proposed. In the future, on the basis of this model, a system for creating an aircraft product can be built and developed, which will be harmonized with existing world practices and will allow the domestic aircraft construction enterprises to fight for participation in international programs and projects.

References

  1. GOST 2.103-68. Unified system for design documentation. Stages of designing.
  2. GOST 15.001-88. System of products development and launching into manufacture. Products of industrial and technical designation.
  3. DSTU 3278-95. System of product development and launching into manufacture. Basic terms and definitions.
  4. DSTU V-P 15.004:2019. System of development and launching into manufacture of armament and military equipment. Life cycle stages of armament and military equipment.
  5. ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288:2016. System engineering and software. System life cycle processes.
  6. ISO/IEC TS 24748-1:2018. Systems and software engineering. Life cycle management. Part 1: Guidelines for life cycle management.
  7. NATO Standard ААР-20:2015. NATO programme management framework (NATO Life Cycle Model). Edition C Version 1, 2015, 78 p.
  8. NATO Standard AAP-48:2013. NATO system life cycle processes. Edition B Version 1, 2013, 68 p.
  9. 15288-2015. ISO/IEC/IEEE International Standard - Systems and software engineering - System life cycle processes. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, pp. 1–118, 2015. DOI: 10.1109/IEEESTD.2015.7106435.
  10. ISO/IEC TR 24774:2016. Systems and software engineering, Life cycle management, Guidelines for process description.
  11. ISO/IEC TR 24748-2:2015. Systems and software engineering. Life cycle management. Part 2: Guide to the application of ISO/IEC 15288 (System life cycle processes).
  12. ISO/IEC/IEEE 16326:2015. Systems and software engineering. Life cycle processes. Project management.
  13. ISO 21500:2021. Project, programme and portfolio management. Context and concepts.
  14. ISO 21502:2020. Project, programme and portfolio management. Guidance on project management.
  15. ISO 21503:2022. Project, programme and portfolio management. Guidance on programme management.
  16. ISO 21504:2015. Project, programme and portfolio management. Guidance on portfolio management.
  17. ISO 21505:2017. Project, programme and portfolio management. Guidance on governance.
  18. ECSS–E–10A. System Engineering (19 April 1996), 66 p.
  19. ECSS–M–30A. Project Phasing and Planning (19 April 1996), 40 p.
  20. ECSS–M–40A. Configuration Management (19 April 1996), 27 p.
  21. ECSS-M-40B. Configuration Management (20 May 2005), 90 p.
  22. A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide), Sixth edition. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute, 2017, 711 p.
  23. A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide). Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute, 2018, 726 p.
  24. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) and The Standard for Project Management, Seventh Edition. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute, 2021, 300 p.
  25. A. Gray, K. Richardson, K. Rooke and T. Thornburn, “Guide to Life Cycles and Life Cycle Models”, INCOSE UK Ltd., Issue 1.1, 2016, 41 p. Available: https://www.apm.org.uk/media/13835/guide-to-lifecycle-models.pdf.
  26. NASA systems engineering, handbook, 2007, 297 p. Available: https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/nasa_systems_engineering_handbook_0.pdf.
  27. AP2054 Main. Develop new A/C (DnA), Business Process Definition. Issue: A, May 2001, 4 p.
  28. AP2054 Module 1. Develop new A/C (DnA), Business Process Definition, Milestones Model. Issue: A, May 2001, 21 p.
  29. AP2054 Module 2. Develop new A/C (DnA), Business Process Definition, Digital Product. Issue: A, May 2001, 42 p.
  30. AM2054. Design Integration and Build (DIB), Milestones. Issue: B, Nov 1998, 55 p.
  31. Standard of IAC PC. Procedure for managing aviation programs of IAC PC, General principles. Version 4.0, 2008, 89 p.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-22

How to Cite

[1]
S. Kryvova, C. Zvorykin, and S. Trubachev, “Adaptation of corporate model of ukrainian aircraft product life cycle to the international methodology of systems engineering”, Mech. Adv. Technol., vol. 7, no. 3 (99), pp. 394–404, Dec. 2023.

Issue

Section

Aviation Systems and Technologies