Methods for Enhancing the Energy Efficiency of Pneumatic Drives

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20535/2521-1943.2025.9.1(104).310948

Keywords:

positional pneumatic drive, recuperation, energy efficiency, compressed air, pneumatic circuit

Abstract

This paper investigates various methods of increasing energy efficiency and energy recovery in pneumatic systems, namely reducing the amount of compressed air used by a pneumatic drive.
The low energy efficiency of pneumatic systems is a significant challenge for their development, as pneumatic systems are widely used in industry for various tasks, including equipment control, automation of manufacturing processes, and material transportation. The low energy efficiency of these systems leads to significant energy losses, which increases operating costs and reduces overall productivity.
As a result of the analysis of existing methods, tables of investment and operating costs, and schedules of the payback period for each of the methods were developed. The main researched methods include parameter optimization, exhaust air storage in the receiver, combination of parameter optimization and exhaust air storage in the receiver, quantitative air intake method, and air intake and exhaust optimization.
The obtained results showed that the greatest savings and efficiency are achieved when using methods that use compressed gas expansion. This is due to the possibility of reducing air costs and increasing the payback period of investments due to the reduction of energy losses, due to the use of a small amount of gas to move the pneumatic cylinder piston.
The field of practical application of the results covers industrial enterprises that use pneumatic systems. Implementation conditions include the need for initial investments and analysis of current system parameters to select the optimal energy efficiency improvement strategy. According to the results of the work, the possibility of reducing energy consumption by 43 to 76 percent was found.

References

  1. M. L. Cai and T. Kagawa, “Energy consumption assessment and energy loss analysis in pneumatic system,” Chin. J. Mech. Eng., vol. 43, pp. 69–74, 2007, doi: https://doi.org/10.3901/JME.2007.09.069.
  2. M. L. Cai and T. Kagawa, “Simulation for energy savings in pneumatic system,” in Systems Modeling and Simulation, Tokyo, Japan: Springer, 2007, pp. 258–261, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-49022-7_52.
  3. F. Yang, K. Tadano, G. Li and T. Kagawa, “Analysis of the Energy Efficiency of a Pneumatic Booster Regulator with Energy Recovery,” Appl. Sci., vol. 7, no. 816, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/app7080816 .
  4. J. Hepke and J. Weber, “Energy saving measures on pneumatic drive systems,” in Proc. 13th Scandinavian International Con-ference on Fluid Power, SICFP2013, Linköping, Sweden, June 3–5, 2013. Available: https://www.optiy.eu/download/EnergySaving.pdf.
  5. H. Paul, “Energy efficiency in pneumatic production systems: State of the art and future directions,” in Proc. 19th CIRP Interna-tional Conference on Life Cycle Engineering, Berkeley, CA, USA, May 2012, pp. 363–368, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29069-5_62.
  6. P. Harris, G. E. O'Donnell and T. Whelan, “Energy efficiency in pneumatic production systems: State of the art and future direc-tions,” in Leveraging Technology for a Sustainable World, Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2012, pp. 363–368, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29069-5_62.
  7. Z. Jiang, W. Xiong, H. Du, Z. Wang and L. Wang, “Energy-saving methods in pneumatic actuator stroke using compressed air,” J. Eng., vol. 2021, pp. 241–251, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1049/tje2.12000.
  8. H. Du et al., “Energy efficiency control of pneumatic actuator systems through nonlinear dynamic optimization,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 184, pp. 511–519, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.117.
  9. R. Fourer, D. M. Gay and B. W. Kernighan, AMPL: A Modeling Language for Mathematical Programming, 2nd ed., Duxbury, MA: Thomson Learning, 2002.
  10. P. Liao et al., “Compressed air leak detection based on time delay estimation using a portable multi-sensor ultrasonic detector,” Measurement Science and Technology, vol. 24, no. 5, 2013, Art. no. 055102, doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/24/5/055102.
  11. S. Hossein, W. David and J. Ronald, “Compressed air energy storage (CAES) with compressors distributed at heat loads to enable waste heat utilization,” Applied Energy, 2013.

Published

2025-03-18

How to Cite

[1]
O. Haletskii and A. Kasian, “Methods for Enhancing the Energy Efficiency of Pneumatic Drives”, Mech. Adv. Technol., vol. 9, no. 1(104), pp. 51–58, Mar. 2025.

Issue

Section

Mechanics