Dependence of the parts dimensions’ accuracy on the internal structure of the layers when 3D printing using Fused Filament Fabrication technology

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20535/2521-1943.2025.9.1(104).317251

Keywords:

3D printing, Additive Technologies, composite materials, Fused Filament Fabrication, regression analysis

Abstract

This paper presents the results of the study of the obtained dimensions accuracy depending on the internal structure of the layers when manufacturing samples from the composite material ABS pro CCF using the Fused Filament Fabrication technology. The accuracy was estimated as the deviation of the actual obtained dimension from the nominal dimension of the sample in percent depending on the following factors: infill pattern, infill density and nominal dimension value. The experiments were conducted using the full factorial experiment method. Regression models were built using the PRIAM software. Analysis of the obtained model, in particular, the graphs of marginal regression equations and marginal response surfaces, showed that the structure of the infill can differently affect the accuracy of the obtained dimensions: for example, for larger dimension, the best result was obtained when using the “Grid” infill pattern. For a smaller dimension (10 mm), for different infill density options, different patterns showed different results: for a density of 80 %, the “Cubic Subdivision” infill pattern turned out to be the best; for a density of 60 %, the “Grid” infill pattern was the best. When using the “Grid” infill pattern, as the infill density increases from 60 % to 100 %, the response function behaves in the opposite way for small and medium dimensions: for a dimension of 10 mm, the response function moves away from the optimal value, and for a dimension of 150 mm, the response function, on the contrary, approaches the optimal value. The explanation of this phenomenon requires additional research, in particular with a larger number of levels of variation of the measured dimension, as well as taking into account the location of the measured dimension relative to the printer coordinate system during the build.

References

  1. V. Pasichnyk, S. Burburska, Y. Lashyna, V. Korenkov, “Integrated Process Model for Development and Manufacturing of Customized Orthopedic Implants.” In: Tonkonogyi, V., Ivanov, V., Trojanowska, J., Oborskyi, G., Pavlenko, I. (eds) Advanced Manufacturing Processes V. InterPartner 2023. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, Springer, Cham, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-42778-7_18.
  2. ISO/ASTM 52900:2021 “Additive manufacturing — General principles — Fundamentals and vocabulary”, International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 2021, ASTM International 2021.
  3. A. Alafaghani, A. Qattawi, “Investigating the effect of fused deposition modeling processing parameters using Taguchi design of experiment method,” Journal of Manufacturing Processes, Vol. 36, pp. 164-174, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.09.025.
  4. C. Camposeco-Negrete, “Optimization of FDM parameters for improving part quality, productivity and sustainability of the process using Taguchi methodology and desirability approach,” Progress in Additive Manufacturing, Vol. 5., 2020, pp. 59-65, doi: 10.1007/s40964-020-00115-9.
  5. S.K. Padhi, R.K. Sahu, S.S. Mahapatra, H.C. Das, A.K. Sood, B. Patro, A.K. Mondal, “Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters using a fuzzy inference system coupled with Taguchi philosophy,” Advances in Manufac-turing, Vol. 5, pp 231–242, 2017, doi:10.1007/s40436-017-0187-4
  6. M. Golab, S. Massey, J. Moultrie, “How generalisable are material extrusion additive manufacturing parameter optimisa-tion studies? A systematic review,” Heliyon, Vol. 8, Issue 11, e11592, pp. 1 – 30, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11592.
  7. M. Zaborniak, M. Bremek, G. Budzik, J. Kluczyński, “Analysis of the Dimensional and Shape Accuracy and Repeatabil-ity of Models Produced in the Process of Additive Extrusion of Thermoplastic Polymers Using Fused Filament Fabrica-tion Technology,” Applied Sciences, 14(15), 6404, 2024 doi: 10.3390/app14156404.
  8. MonoFilament. ABS pro CCF (Carbon Fiber). Access mode [5.12.2024]: https://monofilament.com.ua/ua/products/inzhinernye-plastiki/kompozitsionnye-materialy-dlja-3d-printera/abs-pro-ccf-carbon-fiber-o1-75mm-ves0-75kg
  9. UltiMaker Cura. Access mode [5.12.2024]: https://ultimaker.com/software/ultimaker-cura/
  10. S. Lapach, S. Radchenko, P. Babich, “Planning, regression and analysis of PRIAM models (PRIAM)”, Kyiv, 1993.

Published

2025-03-18

How to Cite

[1]
P. Mishchenko, Y. Lashyna, V. Frolov, and S. Lapach, “Dependence of the parts dimensions’ accuracy on the internal structure of the layers when 3D printing using Fused Filament Fabrication technology”, Mech. Adv. Technol., vol. 9, no. 1(104), pp. 106–113, Mar. 2025.

Issue

Section

Up-to-date machines and the technologies of mechanical engineering