Formalization of Technological Processes Based on Vector and Tensor Analysis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20535/2521-1943.2025.9.4(107).341433

Keywords:

vector, tensor, basis, Kronecker symbol, scalar product, cosine similarity, ADS, CTS, TP, PCM

Abstract

The work further develops the results of studies [1]–[5] based on a systematic analysis using an interpretative-formal approach in a new scientific and technical direction – the technological interpretation of provisions of vector and tensor analysis that are similar in meaning. This allows expanding the formal field of representation of technological processes within the concept of their “technological meaning” and increasing the formal capacity of TP description. The results of research are revealed in the practical and production aspects related to TP, providing for the application of vector and tensor analysis in the coordinate approach, technological space, scalar product, matrix tensor, as well as examples of tensor and vector analysis in composite AKZ technology. It is determined that vectors (tensors) can be specified in different ways, depending on the technological context (polymer composite materials technology – PCM), and the set of components is only its representation in a certain (in terms of detail) basis. A coordinate approach is used, as well as the possibility of other methods of specifying and working with vectors (tensors) using the example of ordinary vectors and simple second-rank tensors, characterized by the powerful idea of orthogonality. Since the second vector and tensor represent real technological objects, including: autonomous dynamic systems (ADS), structural and technological solutions (STS), technological processes (TP), in the form of contravariant and covariant vectors, etc.
The interpretative correspondence of the technological interpretation of contravariant and covariant coordinates of a vector is shown, and the nature of the relationships between technological contravariant and technological covariant coordinates is established.
The example demonstrates the invariance of the enlarged stages of a complex technological process in different coordinate systems, which confirms the invariance of the technological vector under the condition of transformation of its coordinates.

References

  1. D. S. Kiva and V. F. Zabashta, “On the fundamental property of polymer composite materials in the context of creating and producing effective structures”, Technological Systems, Vol. 3, pp. 45–55, 2015. Available: https://www.technological-systems.com/index.php/Home/article/view/170G.
  2. A. Krivov, Yu. M.Tarasov, A. G. Gromashev and V. F. Zabashta, “Technologies for non-autoclave forming of power structures from polymer composite materials”, Technological Systems, Vol. 5, pp. 47–70, 2009. Available: https://www.technological-systems.com/index.php/Home/article/view/539.
  3. D. S. Kiva and V. F. Zabashta, “Composite wing caisson for transport aircraft (structural-technological aspects)”, Technological Systems, Vol. 3, pp. 7–31, 2018. Available: https://www.technological-systems.com/index.php/Home/article/view/144.
  4. A. V. Kovalenko, Research of binders for molding products by pressure impregnation. VIAM Proceedings, 1, 2019.
  5. V. F. Zabashta, “Technological preparation of production of composite materials”, Scientific Encyclopedia Mechanical Engineer-ing, Vol. 6, pp. 104–142, 2006.
  6. S. A. Bychkov, A. V. Gaydachuk, A. V. Andreev and Bo. Wang, “Development of new structural-technological solutions for aircraft wings and repair of composite structures”, Open Information and Polymer Integrated Technologies, Vol. 86, pp. 76–89, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.32620/%25x.
  7. GOST R 58932-2020. Technological support for the development and production of aircraft. Procedure for the development and content of directive technological materials.
  8. D. Kiva and V. Zabashta, “Alternative technologies of composite high-loaded aircraft constructions: a qualitative method of making multicriterial decisions. Part I. Initial stages in the problem of decision-making”, Mech. Adv. Technol., Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 203–211, Nov. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.20535/2521-1943.2021.5.2.245000.
  9. V. Zabashta, “Alternative technologies of composite highly loaded of aircraft structures: a qualitative method of making multi-criteria decisions. Part II. Modeling in multi-criteria evaluation of alternatives”, Mech. Adv. Technol., Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 203–220, Oct. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.20535/2521-1943.2022.6.2.265371.
  10. V. Zabashta, “Alternative technologies of composite of highly loaded aircraft structures: a qualitative method for making mul-ticriteria decisions: Part III. Research of the methodological basis in decision-making: technological constructions in in the as-sessment toolki”, Mech. Adv. Technol., Vol. 7, No. 3 (99), pp. 374–388, Dec. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.20535/2521-1943.2023.7.3.293231.
  11. V. Zabashta, “Alternative technologies of composite highly loaded aircraft structures: a qualitative method of making multi-criteria decisions. Comprehensive presentation: Part IV. Equilibrium and stability of the dynamic model of the ADS”, Mech. Adv. Technol., Vol. 8, No. 3(102), pp. 316–331, Sep. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.20535/2521-1943.2024.8.3(102).302969.
  12. V. Zabashta, “Formalization of technological processes based on non-Euclidean geometries: spherical and Riemann geometry”, Mech. Adv. Technol., Vol. 9, No. 2(105), pp. 238–253, Jun. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.20535/2521-1943.2025.9.2(105).325989.
  13. L. S. Lisovska et al., Ensuring synergy of innovative processes at the enterprise. Lviv: LNU “Lviv Polytechnic”, 103-108.
  14. D. Pritykin, Magic of tensor algebra. Electronic resource, 2015. Available: https://habr.com/ru/articles/261991/.
  15. Cosine similarity. Electronic resource. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/computer-science/cosine-similarity.
  16. M. T. Senkiv, Vector and tensor analysis. Lecture notes. Lviv: Ivan Franko Lviv State University, 146 p., 1990.
  17. S. M. Grebenyuk, Yu. M. Strelyaev and M. I. Klymenko, Tensor analysis. Zaporizhzhia: ZNU, 90 p., 2015.
  18. Zh. V. Khuda, Lecture notes on the discipline “Fundamentals of vector and tensor analysis,” Kamianske: DSTU, 2020, 63 p.
  19. O. V. Nikulin and T. V. Nakonechna, Fundamentals of vector and tensor calculus. Dnipropetrovsk: Bila K.O. publishing, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://www.dstu.dp.ua/Portal/Data/1/5/3-21-b.pdf.
  20. G. M. Zrazhevsky and V. F. Zrazhevska, Applied vector analysis. Kyiv: KDU, 142 p., 2023. [Online]. Available: https://mechmat.knu.ua/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/applied_vector_analysis.pdf.
  21. L. J. McConnell, Introduction to tensor analysis with applications to geometry, mechanics, physics. Moscow: Fizmatgiz, 1963, 221 p. [Online]. Available: https://ikfia.ysn.ru/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Mak-Konnel1963ru.pdf.
  22. M. A. Razumkova, and V. M. Khotyaintseva, Fundamentals of vector tensor analysis. Kyiv: KNU, 218 p., 2011. [Online]. Available: https://iht.knu.ua/sites/default/files/ovta-posibnyk_0.pdf.

Published

2025-12-29

How to Cite

[1]
V. Zabashta, “Formalization of Technological Processes Based on Vector and Tensor Analysis”, Mech. Adv. Technol., vol. 9, no. 4(107), pp. 456–468, Dec. 2025.

Issue

Section

Aviation Systems and Technologies