Critical Traverse Velocity Threshold for Through-Cut of 3 mm CFRP by Abrasive Waterjet: a Binary Logistic Model Based on Post-Cut Images

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20535/2521-1943.2026.10.1.343235

Keywords:

abrasive waterjet, carbon fibre-reinforced polymer, through-cut threshold, binary logistic regression, traverse velocity

Abstract

Abrasive waterjet (AWJ) trimming of thin carbon fibre-reinforced polymer (CFRP) laminates faces the challenge of defining a reliable process window to ensure full penetration without costly metrology. This study establishes, for the first time, a statistically validated through-cut threshold for 3 mm quasi-isotropic T300/epoxy CFRP under standard industrial AWJ parameters (pressure: 200 MPa, abrasive mass flow rate: 120 g/min, standoff distance: 5 mm). Using only post-cut digital caliper measurements and photographic documentation—a low-cost metrology approach—a binary logistic regression model was calibrated from experimental data at three traverse velocities (300, 500, and 700 mm/min, n = 8 replicates each), yielding empirical through-cut probabilities of 1.00, 0.375, and 0.00, respectively. Firth’s bias-reduced penalised likelihood method was employed to address complete separation in the data, providing stable parameter estimates. The model identifies a critical traverse velocity of V₉₅= 292 mm/min (95 % profile-likelihood:276–308 mm/min) guaranteeing 95 % through-cut probability. This quantifies and validates the empirical shop-floor rule of "≤ 300 mm/min". The estimated transition zone width (~200 mm/min) is markedly narrower than that reported for ductile metals, attributable to the low interlaminar fracture toughness of CFRP, which precipitates abrupt, unstable delamination once jet energy flux falls below a critical level. Cross-validation demonstrated a predictive accuracy of 95.8 %. The study provides a robust, accessible framework for process window calibration in small-to-medium enterprises, bridging the gap between empirical practice and statistically controlled manufacturing for thin CFRP components.

References

  1. T. Chen, F. Gao, S. Li and X. Liu, “Experimental study on cutting tool wear in milling carbon fiber composites with spiral staggered diamond-coated milling cutter”, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 98, no. 1-4, pp. 413–419, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2297-y.
    |
  2. A. Salenko, O. Chencheva, V. Glukhova, V. Shchetynin, M. R. F. Budar, S. Klimenko and E. Lashko, “Effect of slime and dust emission on micro-cutting when processing carbon-carbon composites”, Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, vol. 3, no. 1 (105), pp. 38–51, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2020.203279.
    |
  3. F. Psarommatis, G. May, V. Azamfirei and F. Konstantinidis, “Optimizing efficiency and zero-defect manufacturing with in-process inspection: challenges, benefits, and aerospace application”, Procedia Computer Science, vol. 232, pp. 2857–2866, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.02.102.
    |
  4. B. R. N. Murthy, E. Makki, S. R. Potti, A. Hiremath, G. Bolar, J. Giri and T. Sathish, “Optimization of Process Parameters to Minimize the Surface Roughness of Abrasive Water Jet Machined Jute/Epoxy Composites for Different Fiber Inclinations”, Journal of Composites Science, vol. 7, no. 12, p. 498, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs7120498.
    |
  5. G. Wang, S. Qiao, G. Wang, Q. Jiang and J. Singh, “Determination and Application of Optimum Abrasive Mass Flow Rate of Abrasive Waterjet”, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 5377–5387, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-023-1980-1.
    |
  6. G. Krolczyk, P. Nieslony, S. Legutko, S. Hloch and I. Samardzic, "Investigation of selected surface integrity features of duplex stainless steel (DSS) after turning", Metalurgija, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 91–94, 2015. Available: https://hrcak.srce.hr/126702.
  7. L. M. Hlaváč, “Revised Model of Abrasive Water Jet Cutting for Industrial Use”, Materials, vol. 14, no. 14, p. 4032, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14144032.
    | |
  8. M. Li, X. Lin, X. Yang, H. Wu and X. Meng, “Study on kerf characteristics and surface integrity based on physical energy model during abrasive waterjet cutting of thick CFRP laminates”, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 113, no. 1-2, pp. 73–85, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06590-w.
    |
  9. M. M. Korat and G. D. Acharya, “A Review on Current Research and Development in Abrasive Waterjet Machining”, International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 423–432, 2014. Available: https://www.academia.edu/38782824/A_Review_on_Current_Research_and_Development_in_Abrasive_Waterjet_Machining.
  10. J. Wang, “Abrasive Waterjet Machining of Polymer Matrix Composites – Cutting Performance, Erosive Process and Predictive Models”, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 757–768, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001700050129.
  11. D. K. Shanmugam, T. Nguyen and J. Wang, “A study of delamination on graphite/epoxy composites in abrasive waterjet machining”, Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 923–929, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.04.001.
    |

Published

2026-04-23

How to Cite

[1]
X. Xue, “Critical Traverse Velocity Threshold for Through-Cut of 3 mm CFRP by Abrasive Waterjet: a Binary Logistic Model Based on Post-Cut Images”, Mech. Adv. Technol., vol. 10, no. 1, Apr. 2026.

Issue

Section

Advanced Mechanical Engineering and Manufacturing Technologies