Digital Twin Development of a Turning Machine for Designing a Stability Diagram

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20535/2521-1943.2026.10.1.353272

Keywords:

turning machining system

Abstract

The turning machining system as an object of study and the dynamic phenomena that constitute the problem that leads to the occurrence of vibrations are presented. The definition of a vibration-free cutting mode is proposed according to the stability diagram simultaneously for two components of the cutting mode – depth and feed. The mathematical model reflects the machining system as a three-mass one in the form of oscillatory links interconnected by negative feedbacks for elastic displacements and positive feedbacks through the delay function. A mathematical model has been developed in the form of a digital twin, due to its representation in state variables, which allows for modeling by numerical methods. Such a model is the basis of the created software, which allows predicting the behavior of the machining system in time and frequency spaces depending on the initial parameters of the machining system and the cutting mode. To ensure adequacy, the model uses dynamic parameters obtained by experimental modal analysis methods. The created software allows you to design stability diagrams of the machining system in the coordinates “cutting depth – speed” and
“feed – speed”. The design is carried out automatically according to the stability criterion, which is based on the analysis of the location of the frequency response hodograph on the complex plane. The adequacy of the developed mathematical model and the created procedures for automatic design of the stability diagram is experimentally confirmed by comparing theoretical results and the roughness of the machined surface. The developed digital model and software allow you to choose a vibration-free cutting mode, which guarantees the required quality of machining at maximum productivity.

References

  1. N. V. Nalande et al., “Deep Learning for Vibration Signature Analysis in CNC Turning:‎ A Review of Modern Techniques and Future Directions,” International Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 578–590, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.14419/cmf93x48.
  2. G. Urbikain et al., “Prediction Methods and Experimental Techniques for Chatter Avoidance in Turning Systems: A Review,” Applied Sciences, Vol. 9(21), 4718, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/app9214718.
  3. I. Mancisidor et al., “Fixed Boundaries Receptance Coupling Substructure Analysis for Tool Point Dynamics Prediction”, Ad-vanced Materials Research, Vol. 223, pp. 622–631, 2011, doi: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.223.622.
  4. G. Quintana, J. Ciurana and D. Teixidor, “A new experimental methodology for identification of stability lobes diagram in mill-ing operations,” International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, Vol. 48, pp. 1637–1645, 2008, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2008.07.006.
  5. N. S. Belwalkar, S. Mohite and G. V. Kashyapi, “Identification of stability lobe diagram for milling using vibration analysis,” International Journal on Design & Manufacturing Technologies, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 23–27, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.18000/ijodam.70155.
  6. Y. Altintas, “Manufacturing Automation”, Cambridge University Press, 2012, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511843723.
  7. R. Kountanya, “Chatter stability with orthogonal rotation,” Wolfram Demonstration Project, 2014, [Online]. Available: http://demonstrations.wolfram.com/ChatterStabilityWithOrthogonalRotation/.
  8. M. A. Royandi et al., “Modeling of Vibration Behaviors of Turning Machining with the Constant Surface Speed Effect,” Ad-vances in Science and Technology Research Journal, Vol. 15(3), pp. 134–145, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.12913/22998624/138925.
  9. I. Mancisidor et al., “Fixed Boundaries Receptance Coupling Substructure Analysis for Tool Point Dynamics Prediction,” Ad-vanced Materials Research, Vol. 223, pp. 622–631, 2011, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.223.622.
  10. Y. Altintas et al., “Chatter Stability of Machining Operations”, Journal of Manufacturing science and engineering, Vol. 142(11), 110801, 19 pages, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4047391.
  11. R. Samin et al., “Research of Chatter Suppression in Turning Operation with Process Damping using Stability Lobe Diagram,” International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE), Vol. 8, Issue-12S2, pp. 539–543, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.L1100.10812S219.
  12. G. Quintana and J. Ciurana, “Chatter in machining processes: A review,” International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufac-ture, Vol. 51(5), pp. 363–376, 2011, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2011.01.001.
  13. S. Nam et al., “Analytical prediction of chatter stability for modulated turning,” International Journal of Machine Tools & Manu-facture, Vol. 165, 103739, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2021.103739.
  14. M. Jasiewicz, K. Miądlicki, “An integrated CNC system for chatter suppression in turning,” Advances in Production Engineer-ing & Management, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 318–330, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.14743/apem2020.3.368.
  15. H. A. Çetindağ et al., “Review of chatter control techniques in turning and boring,” Int. J Adv Manuf. Technol., Vol. 139, pp. 5363–5407, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-025-16188-1.
  16. P. Gupta and B. Singh, “Analyzing chatter vibration during turning on computer numerical control lathe using ensemble local mean decomposition and probabilistic approach,” Noise & Vibration Worldwide, Vol. 52(6), pp. 168–180, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957456521999871.
  17. C. Shen and C. Lu, “A Method to Obtain Frequency Response Functions of Operating Mechanical Systems Based on Experi-mental Modal Analysis and Operational Modal Analysis,” Machines, Vol. 12(8), 516, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/machines12080516.
  18. H. Yang, K. Yang and H. Liang, “Investigation of turning force and vibration characteristics modeling and experiment of two degree-of-freedom system,” Advances in Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 17(9), pp. 1–18, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/16878132251369470.
  19. Y. Altintas, “Virtual High Performance Machining,” Procedia CIRP, Vol. 46, pp. 372–378, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.04.154.
  20. G. E. Plaza and P. J. Núñez López, “Analysis of cutting force signals by wavelet packet transform for surface roughness moni-toring in CNC turning,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 98, pp. 634–651, 2018, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.05.006.
  21. Machining handbook – 2-part (EN), https://www.hoffmann-group.com/GB/en/houk/know-how/machining-handbook/e/61245/.
  22. Y. Petrakov and M. Danylchenko, “A Time-Frequency Approach to Ensuring Stability of Machining by Turning,” Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, Vol. 6, No. 2(120), pp. 85–92, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2022.268637.
  23. Y. Petrakov, O. Ohrimenko, O. Pasichnyk and A. Petryshyn, “Determination Modal parameters a Turning machining system,” Mech. Adv. Technol., Vol. 9, No. 2(105), рр. 176–184, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.20535/2521-1943.2025.9.2(105).331541.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-22

How to Cite

[1]
Y. Petrakov, O. Okhrimenko, and O. Pasichnik, “Digital Twin Development of a Turning Machine for Designing a Stability Diagram ”, Mech. Adv. Technol., vol. 10, no. 1, Apr. 2026.

Issue

Section

Advanced Mechanical Engineering and Manufacturing Technologies