STRESS-STRAINE STATE OF THE CYLINDRICAL WALLED PERFORATED SHELLS

Authors

  • Б. О. Яхно National Technical University of Ukraine «Kyiv Polytechnic Institute», Kyiv, Ukraine
  • С. И. Трубачев National Technical University of Ukraine «Kyiv Polytechnic Institute», Kyiv,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20535/2305-9001.2013.67.37763

Keywords:

equvivalent stiffness, perforated shall, cylindricall shall, stress concentration

Abstract

In the article was discussed the problem of the stress determination in thick-walled cylinders. This task type is used for strength analyse of nuclear power plant equipment, for example - steam generator. Analytical solution for axial-symmetric construction parts was discussed.  The perforation holes make geometrical inhomogeneity of structure, so numerical solution was find in solid and shall formulation. Equivalent rigidity of the shall don’t account a stress concentration from holes. This fact was shown on fig.4b. It’s necessary to use solid (3D) geometrical task formulation to calculate stress concentration level. The stress-strain state of thick-walled cylindrical perforated shell under internal pressure is consider. Defined the reduced stiffness of the shell by defining an equivalent thickness. A numerical calculation using solid (3D) and shell finite elements is done. Analyzed stress-straine state of circle perforating holes and the thickness of the wall. Compared the stress-straine state obtained on solid three-dimensional model with the results for a shell with equvivalent stiffness. Were given advice on the definition of strass-straine state by using the eqvivalent stiffness considering stress concentration

Author Biographies

Б. О. Яхно, National Technical University of Ukraine «Kyiv Polytechnic Institute», Kyiv

к.т.н. доц.

С. И. Трубачев, National Technical University of Ukraine «Kyiv Polytechnic Institute», Kyiv

к.т.н. доц.

References

1. Grigoluk A.I., Filshtinskij L.A. Perforirovannie plastyni I obolochki. Moscow: Nauka, 1970. 556 p.

2. ZarubinV.S., StankevichI.V.Paschetteplonapriazennichkonstrukcij. Moscow: Мashinostroenie, 2005. 352p.

3. MozharovskyN.S.Theorijapruznosty, plastychnostyIpolzuchesty. Pidruchnnik. Kiev: HighSchool., 2002. 308р.

4. Zenkiewicz O. C. Metodkonechnixelementowvtechnike. Moscow: MIR, 1975. 542p.

5. Getting Started with ABAQUS. USA, Abaqus inc., 2003. 497 p.

6. FKM – Guideline, Analytical Strength Assessment Of Components In Mechanical Engineering, 5th, revised edition, English Version, Forschungskuratorium Maschinenbau (FKM), FrankfurtMain, 2003. 268р.

7. Norrie D., Freese J. Vvedenie v metod konechnich elementov. Moscow: MIR.,1981. 304р.

Published

2015-02-12

Issue

Section

Статті