Numerical modeling of crack initiation and propagation processes in various specimen’s types using the GTN material damage model

Authors

  • Andrew Kravchuk GS Institute of Strength Problems Pisarenko NAS of Ukraine, Ukraine
  • Eugene Kondriakov GS Pisarenko Institute of Strength Problems of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine
  • Valery Kharchenko GS Pisarenko Institute of Strength Problems of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20535/2521-1943.2021.5.1.225839

Keywords:

GTN material damage model; finite element method; crack initiation and propagation; Charpy specimen; CT specimen.

Abstract

Problematic. A combination of experimental and computational methods for studying the processes of crack initiation and propagation in various specimen’s types is used to determine the mechanical properties of materials, as well as to improve the accuracy of assessing the strength and durability of structural elements.

Research objective. Determination of the parameters of the Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman (GTN) material damage model based on the numerical modeling results of various specimen’s types under various types of loading for steel 22K using the finite element method.

Realization technique. Using the finite element method, numerical modeling of the processes of cracks nucleation and propagation in cylindrical specimens under uniaxial tension, in Charpy specimens under dynamic loading, and also in CT specimens under quasi-static loading was carried out for steel 22K using the GTN material damage model.

The results of research. By comparing the experimental and numerical results, the full set of GTN material model parameters for steel 22K was determined. The stress state in the crack tip area and the kinetics of its propagation in the material of various specimen’s types under static and dynamic loading were estimated.

Conclusions. The GTN material damage model with the parameter values determined from experiments, can be used for numerical simulation of the processes of crack initiation and propagation both in specimens of various types under various loading types, and in structural elements.

References

  1. F.M. Beremin, A. Pineau and F. Mudry, "A local criterion for cleavage fracture of a nuclear pressure vessel steel", Met. Trans. A. Vol.14, No. 11. pp. 2277-2287, 1983. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02663302
  2. A.L. Gurson, "Continuum theorie of ductile rupture by void nucleation and growth: Part I–Yield criteria and flow rules for porous ductile", J. Eng. Mater. Tech., No. 1, Vol. 99, pp. 2-15, 1977. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3443401
  3. V. Tvergaard, A. Needleman, "Analysis of the cup-cone fracture in a round tensile bar", Acta Metall, No. 1, Vol. 32, pp. 157–169, 1984. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(84)90213-X
  4. G. Rousselier, "Ductile fracture models and their potential in local approach of fracture", Nucl. Eng. Design, Vol. 105, No. 1, pp. 97-111, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(87)90234-2
  5. I. Scheider, W. Brocks, “Simulation of cup-cone fracture using the cohesive model”, Eng. Fract. Mech., No. 14, Vol. 70, pp. 1943–1961, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7944(03)00133-4
  6. Ya. Chahboub, S. Szavai, “Determination of GTN parameters for SENT specimen during ductile fracture”, Procedia Structural Integrity, Vol. 16, pp. 81–88, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2019.07.025
  7. A. Eberle, D. Klingbeil and J. Schicker, “The calculation of dynamic JR-curves from the finite element analysis of a Charpy test using a rate-dependent damage model”, Nuclear Engineering and Design, No. 1-2, Vol. 198, pp. 75-87, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(99)00281-2
  8. Young-Ryun Oh. et al., “Application of the GTN model to ductile crack growth simulation in through-wall cracked pipes”, International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, Vol. 159, pp. 35–44, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2017.11.006
  9. E.A. Kondryakov, “Chislennoe modelirovanie udarnykh ispytanii obraztsov sharpi v dvukhmernoi i trekhmernoi postanovke”, Vіsnik NTUU “KPІ”, Seriya mashinobuduvannya, No. 2(71), pp. 110-113, 2014.
  10. E.A. Kondryakov, A.V. Panasenko, “Raschetnoe opredelenie momenta zarozhdeniya treshchiny v standartnykh obraztsakh Sharpi i obraztsakh s bokovymi nadrezami”, Vіsnik NTUU “KPІ”, Seriya mashinobuduvannya, No. 1(73), pp. 38-42, 2015.
  11. E.A. Kondryakov, A.V. Panasenko and V.V. Kharchenko, “Experimental determination of the moment of fracture initiation in standard Charpy specimens and specimens with edge notches”, Strength of Materials, No. 2, Vol. 47, pp. 291–296, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-015-9658-7
  12. X. Li et al., “A modified correlation between K JIC and Charpy V-notch impact energy of Chinese SA508-III steel at the upper shelf”, Journal of Nuclear Materials, Vol. 505, pp. 22–29, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.03.056
  13. M. Yu, Z. Luo and Y.J. Chao, “Correlations between Charpy V-notch impact energy and fracture toughness of nuclear reactor pressure vessel (RPV) steels”, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 147, pp. 187–202, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.08.008
  14. Z. Chen et al., “Estimation of fracture toughness of 16MnDR steel using Master Curve method and Charpy V-notch impact energy”, Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 96, pp. 443–451, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2018.06.007

Published

2021-06-23

How to Cite

[1]
A. Kravchuk, E. Kondriakov, and V. Kharchenko, “Numerical modeling of crack initiation and propagation processes in various specimen’s types using the GTN material damage model”, Mech. Adv. Technol., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 49–56, Jun. 2021.

Issue

Section

Mechanics