Alternative technologies of composite highly loaded of aircraft structures: a qualitative method of making multi-criteria decisions. Part II. Modeling in multi-criteria evaluation of alternatives

Authors

  • Volodymyr Zabashta JSC "Ukrainian Scientific and Research Institute of Aviation Technology" (UkrNDIAT), Kyiv, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20535/2521-1943.2022.6.2.265371

Keywords:

Alternative technological processes (ATP), VSP, composites (PCM), prepreg, infusion, POPR, hierarchical structure, ADS, interpretation, parabola, attractor, torus

Abstract

The second part of the article is based on the starting points in the decision-making problem (DPR) indicated at the first stage of research [1, point 2.]. Here, the comparison of alternative autoclaved and non-autoclaved technologies for the production of carbon-plastic aircraft structures (AK) of the highly loaded type is continued wing caisson stringer panels (VSP) of B787, A350, MC-21, CSeries mainline aircraft. The main provisions of decision-making theory and a system-process approach with the involvement of practice results are taken as the methodological basis. From the beginning, the following are presented: a scheme for assessing the relative quality of technological process objects; a block-type conceptual model of the subject area of ​​decision-making and its basis; composition of selection criteria and indicators. Based on the above and with the involvement of autonomous dynamic systems (ADS) with discrete time, as well as the theory of the parabola (quadratic function), a formalized model of systemically grouped processes in the evaluation of alternatives is given. On this basis, the study of the essential differences of alternatives with the interpretation of topology ideas (homology groups) was continued to support the adoption of a reasoned final decision in the future, as the goal of modeling this separate side of the functioning of the technical system.

References

  1. D. Kіva and V. Zabashta, “Alternative technologies of composite high-loaded aircraft constructions: a qualitative method of making multicriterial decisions. Part I. Initial stages in the problem of decision-making”, Mechanics and Advanced Technologies, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 203–211, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20535/2521-1943.2021.5.2.245000.
  2. E.A.Veshkin et al., Opyt primeneniya vakuum – infuzionnykh tekhnologii v proizvodstve konstruktsii iz PKM, FGUP “VIAM”, 2018, pp.16–28.
  3. O.N. Komissar, Kompetentsii gosudarstvennykh nauchnykh tsentrov v Rossii v sozdanii kompozitnikh kryl'ev samoletov, FGUP “VIAM”, 2018, pp.51–59.
  4. P. A. Gudkov, Metody sravnitel'nogo analiza. Penza: PGU, 2008, 81 p.
  5. O. I. Kushlyk-Dyvulʹsʹka and B. R. Kushlyk, Osnovy teoriyi pryynyattya rishenʹ. Kyiv: NTUU “KPІ”, 2014, 94 p. Available: https://ela.kpi.ua/handle/123456789/6917.
  6. V. V. Podinovskiy, Vvedeniye v teoriyu vazhnosti kriteriyev v mnogokriterial'nykh zadachakh prinyatiya resheniy. Moscow: Fizmatlit, 2007, 64 p.
  7. Kontseptual'naya model'. Available: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%BD%D1%86%D0%B5%D0%BF%D1%82%D1%83%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8C.
  8. P. M. Pavlenko, Osnovy matematychnoho modelyuvannya system i protsesiv. Kyiv: Knyzhkove vydavnytstvo NAU, 2013, 201 p.
  9. V. L. Chechulin, Metod prostranstva sostoyaniy upravleniya kachestvom slozhnykh khimiko-tekhnologicheskikh protsessov. Perm': PGNIU, 2011, 114 p.
  10. Ugleplastik vs alyuminiy: blagodarya novym materialam MS-21 priobretayet unikal'nyye kharaketristiki. Available: https://uacrussia.livejournal.com/67193.html.
  11. V. V. Pilipenko, Ye. S. Pereverzev and V. M. Fedorov, "Koeffitsiyenty bezopasnosti i prochnost' konstruktsiy", Tekhnicheskaya mekhanika, no. 1, pp. 89-98, 2009.
  12. S. A. Smotrova, S. M. Naumov and A. V. Smotrov, Tekhnologii izgotovleniya silovykh agregatov aviatsionnykh konstruktsiy iz polimernykh kompozitsionnykh materialov. Moscow: Tekhnosfera, 2015, 216 p.
  13. S. A. Smotrova and I. D. Simonov-Yemel'yanov, "Effektivnyye tekhnologii formovaniya vysokonagruzhennykh aviatsionnykh konstruktsiy iz polimernykh kompozitsionnykh materialov", Konstruktsii iz kompozitsionnykh materialov, no. 3, pp. 15-24, 2016.
  14. G. N. Zamula and K. A. Kolesnik, "Vesovaya i toplivnaya effektivnost' primeneniya kompozitsionnykh materialov v aviakonstruktsiyakh", Polet, no. 2, pp. 12-19, 2018.
  15. S.F. Ilyushenkov and P.N. Sereduga, “Vozmozhnosti snizheniya massy elementov inter'era v sovremennykh passazhir-skikh samoletov”, Polimer.mater.: izdeliya, oborudovaniya, tekhnologiya, pp. 32–38, 2019.
  16. G.N. Zamula and K.A. Kolesnik, “Vesovaya i toplivnaya efektivnost' primeneniya kompozitsionnykh materialov v avia-konstruktsiyakh”, Polet, No. 2, pp. 13–19, 2018.
  17. G. N. Zamula and K. A. Kolesnik, "Sposoby povysheniya vesovoy effektivnosti primeneniya kompozitsionnykh konstruktsiy", Polet, no. 10, pp. 14-24, 2018.
  18. Prepregi iz kompozitsionnykh materialov. Ugleprepregi vysokonagruzhennykh elementov konstruktsii povyshennoi tem-peratury ekspluatatsii, Katalog VIAM. Internet – izdaniya.
  19. P. N. Timoshkov, M. N. Usacheva and A. V. Khrul'kov, "Stickiness and possibility of using prepregs for automated technologies (rewiew)", Proceedings of VIAM, no. 8, pp. 38-46, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18577/2307-6046-2018-0-8-38-46.
  20. Yu.A. Gusev, O.N. Tverdov and A.A.Gromyko, Ugleplastik na osnove svyazuyushchego s nizkoi temperaturoi otver-zhdeniya i uglerodnoi ravnoprochnoi tkani, Trudy VIAM, No. 6, pp. 52–60, 2017.
  21. L.V. Chursina et al., “Termoreaktivnoe svyazuyushchee i polimernye bindery dlya polimernykh kompozitsionnykh ma-terialov, poluchaemykh metodom vakuumnoi infuzii”, Plasticheskie massy, No. 1-2, pp.57–64, 2018.
  22. R.I. Kudryavtsev et al., “Ispol'zovanie svyazuyushchego marki Vs3-30, pererabatyvaemogo po infuzionnoi tekhnologii, dlya izgotovleniya nizko- i srednenagruzhennykh detalei konstruktivnogo naznacheniya”, Trudy VIAM, No. 1, pp. 31–39, 2019.
  23. DOI: doi.org/10.21608/absb.2019.86754
  24. Vliyaniye poristosti v polimernykh kompozitsionnykh materialakh na osnove epoksidnoy matritsy i nepreryvnykh uglerodnykh volokon na yego fiziko-mekhanicheskiye svoystva: dissertatsiya, 2017. Available: https://www.bibliofond.ru/view.aspx?id=903329.
  25. M. I. Dushin, K. I. Donetski and R. Y. Karavaev, "Identification of the reasons of porosity formation when manufacturing composites", Proceedings of VIAM, no. 6, pp. 68-78, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18577/2307-6046-2016-0-6-8-8.
  26. M.O. Yakovlev, A.I. Gulyaev and O.A.Lashov, “Treshchinostoikost' sloistykh polimernykh kompozitsionnykh materi-alov”, Trudy VIAM, No. 4, pp. 106–114, 2016.
  27. B.I. Yarmolenko and Yu.P. Trunin, “Treshchino – i udarostoikost' ugleplastikov na sredneprochnykh zarubezhnykh na-polnitelyakh”, Prochnost' aviatsionnykh konstruktsii, TsAGI, pp. 263–272, 2011.
  28. V.G. Boltyanskii and V.A.Efrimovich, “Ocherk osnovnikh idei topologii (okonchanie)”, Matem. prosv., Vol. 6, pp. 107–138, 1961.
  29. Dzhon L. Kelli, Obshchaya topologiya. Moscow: Nauka, 1981, 432 p.
  30. O. O. Pryshlyak, Topolohiya mnohovydiv. Kyiv: KNU, 2013, 83 p. Available: https://www.mechmat.univ.kiev.ua/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/topolog_pryshljak.pdf.
  31. L.A. Skornyakov, Proektivnye ploskosti, UMN, Vol. 6, No. 6(46), pp. 112–154, 1951.
  32. A. T. Fomenko, Naglyadnaya geometriya i topologiya. Matematicheskiye obrazy v real'nom mire. Moscow: MGU, 1998, 416 p.
  33. Ye. A. Grebennikov, Metod usredneniya v prikladnykh zadachakh. Moscow: Nauka, 1986, 256 p.
  34. T. S. Pigolkina, Avtonomnyye sistemy. Fazovyye trayektorii. Elementy teorii ustoychivosti. Moscow: MFTI, 2013, 40 p.
  35. Metody modelyuvannya ta analohiyi. Available: http://www.zhu.edu.ua/mk_school/pluginfile.php/16981/mod_resource/content/1/%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B8%20%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8E%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F.pdf.
  36. T. L. Saati, "Magicheskoye chislo “sem” v prirode", Cloud of Science, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 5-33, 2017.
  37. A. R. Kamaleyeva, S. Yu. Gruzkova and O. B. Russkova, Kinematika v grafikakh. Kazan': Otechestvo, 2017, 52 p.
  38. G.Iu. Panina, Toricheskie mnogoobraziia. Vvedenie v algebraicheskuiu geometriiu, 2009.

Downloads

Published

2022-10-01

How to Cite

[1]
V. Zabashta, “Alternative technologies of composite highly loaded of aircraft structures: a qualitative method of making multi-criteria decisions. Part II. Modeling in multi-criteria evaluation of alternatives”, Mech. Adv. Technol., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 203–220, Oct. 2022.

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022)

Section

Aviation Systems and Technologies

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Володимир Забашта

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The ownership of copyright remains with the Authors.
 
Authors may use their own material in other publications provided that the Journal is acknowledged as the original place of publication and National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute” as the Publisher.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under CC BY 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work